Back to National Assembly for Wales Homepage Subject Index  The Richard Commisssion
       
     
   
 
Welsh Assembly Government News * Members * Consultation * Calendar of events * Library of evidence * Frequently asked questions * External Links * Contact us
*
 

Response of UCAC to the Richard Commission

Thank you for the opportunity to respond - orally and in writing - to the Richard Commission. UCAC wishes to submit the following comments for your attention. The Union’s comments relate to two specific questions.

Does the Assembly have the powers it needs to operate for Wales?

The restrictions on the Assembly’s powers impact directly on UCAC and its members.

Although the responsibility for teachers’ salaries and working conditions has not been delegated to the Assembly, it is in a position to decide how some of these matters are implemented, and this has created some confusion on a number of occasions. Below are two examples:

  1. In February 2000, the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) introduced a change to the teachers’ pay scale. A higher scale was created, but teachers would have to attain a certain threshold to merit being placed on the new scale. The criteria for attaining the threshold were decided. The Assembly believed it had the right to establish separate criteria for Wales. Following a debate and vote, the Assembly decided against including "pupils' progress" as a criterion. However, the DfES did not favour a different threshold for Wales, so the criteria were very hurriedly included in teachers’ contracts to prevent the Assembly from making any amendments. As a result, the Assembly’s view on teachers’ standards in Wales was never reflected.

    The Assembly was nevertheless responsible for administering the new arrangements in Wales, but all the confusion led to substantial delays, and teachers in Wales had to wait for many months before receiving their entitlements.

  2. Recently, the DfES produced a new agreement on teachers’ workload. Although Assembly officials were present at discussions with the DfES, they were under the impression that they ere there as observers only. At the last minute, the National Assembly was asked to sign the agreement.

The National Assembly drew up 29 urgent amendments to the agreement in order to ensure that the Assembly would have the right to decide how to implement the recommendations in Wales. The DfES accepted only one of these proposed amendments, and the Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning was forced to compromise. A paragraph has been included in the agreement, noting that the Assembly has some rights, though no-one is certain exactly what that implies.

The Assembly will be consulting on documents relating to the implementation of the agreement in Wales. When UCAC asked a senior civil servant what would be the situation if the consultation indicated that the Assembly had to act against the wishes of those who signed the document in London, he replied that he did not know, but emphasised that this was not a legal document. However, all who have signed the document have agreed to promote it.

What would have happened had the Assembly Government declined to sign the agreement? This could well have occurred in an Assembly controlled by a political party different from the party of government in London. The Westminster government was adamant that it would only discuss any amendments to the agreement with the signatories, and with no-one else. UCAC was excluded from such discussions, because of its refusal to sign the document. Would the DfES have treated the National Assembly in the same way, had the Assembly refused to sign?

The following statements by the School Teachers’ Review Body on Pay confirm that all this uncertainty and lack of clarity, relating to responsibility for various aspects of education in Wales, impairs the ability of the Review Body and the Assembly to operate in a fair and effective manner.

1.     "The scene is changing however, with devolution of matters such as teacher appraisal and the new system of performance management to the National Assembly for Wales. Together with the separate funding arrangements which exist for schools in Wales, this has implications for the operation of the overall pay and conditions framework and hence for this Review Body."1

2. "We commented both in our Tenth Report and in our report on the welcome back bonus for returners to teaching in England, on the growing divergence in education policy and practise between England and Wales. Consultees have also brought to our attention the policy implications of The Learning Country, a paving document published in August 2001 by the National Assembly for Wales, and have continued to remark on the different funding arrangements between England and Wales.

"We consider that it is still possible, at present, for one Review body to make recommendations covering both England and Wales. In the future, much will depend upon the extent to which policies between England and Wales will diverge."2

UCAC strongly believe that the National Assembly for Wales should have the right to organise, control and decide upon all aspects of education in Wales, including teachers’ pay and working conditions.

Funding for all aspects of education is allocated by the Westminster government as part of the block grant, based on the Barnett formula. It is never clear what happens when the Chancellor of the Exchequer in London announces that extra funding is to be allocated for special educational schemes in England. Does this represent new money, and should the Assembly receive a corresponding allocation? Here gain there is confusion in the system, which is unacceptable.

 

What changes do you wish to see, and why?

UCAC believes that an Independent Education System for Wales is essential.

To achieve this, the Assembly must have the right to legislate, including tax-varying powers. The Assembly would then have all the powers necessary to assume all the responsibilities relating to education in Wales, including teachers’ pay and working conditions. It does not make sense that the Assembly is responsible for education, but not for the working conditions of the people who deliver education.

The current situation is complex, impractical and unacceptable. Because of all the confusion over different aspects of education, effective operation is impracticable. It is UCAC’s firm belief that the National Assembly must be given the power and the resources to implement an Independent Education System for Wales – with the right to legislate and to raise taxes.

Yours faithfully, 

Edwyn Williams
General Secretary

Footnotes

1 Paragraph 11, School Teachers’ Review Body, Tenth Report 2001

2 Paragraff 15 & 16, School Teachers’ Review Body, Eleventh Report 2002