Overview
|
|
|
| 1. |
As Director of AWEMA, Naz Malik
agreed to give evidence to the Richard Commission on Friday
11th April 2003 at County Hall, Haverfordwest. |
| 2. |
We have laid out our evidence
by closely following the document issued for consultation.
We have synthesised our arguments with the issues that
have been raised in the document. |
| 3. |
Based on our evidence against
the issues, we have drawn our conclusions. |
| 4. |
From our conclusions, AWEMA
is making its own recommendations to the Richard Commission. |
| 5. |
Also, at the front of our submission
in the executive summary, we first provide all our conclusions
under each of the headings as indicated in our Contents
Page. |
| 6. |
Our conclusions are directly
followed by our recommendations in the Executive Summary. |
| 7. |
Under each of the headings we
begin by providing evidence, we then state our conclusions
and our recommendations. This is to aid the Commission
to follow our line of thought. |
| 8. |
We invite the Richard commission
to deliberate on our evidence. |
| 9. |
Should the commission want us
to clarify any of the issues between now and the final
report, AWEMA’s Director will be only too pleased
to oblige.
|
| Naz Malik |
| Director |
|
