|
 |
| |
RESPONSE TO THE CONSULTATION DOCUMENT
Commission on the Powers and Electoral Arrangements
of the National Assembly for Wales
|
From: Richard Noyce
Firstly, an anecdote: I am informed that, when visiting
the National Assembly, Vytautas Landsbergis, the Lithuanian
politician who steered his country towards independence,
looked at a plaque commemorating the opening of the
Assembly and commented, 'There is a mistake - it should
be the National Assembly of Wales.'
|
| The size of the Assembly with no change
in functions
I believe that the present size is probably
about right. While it can be argued that some of the
rural constituencies might be too large to be efficiently
represented by a single member, the current arrangements
in Brecon and Radnorshire, and in Montgomeryshire, seem
to work well. Doubling the number of AMs for constituencies
such as these might help, and might affect the present
political balance. One advantage of keeping the number
of AMs as at present is that a lengthy and potentially
divisive public debate on the issue would be avoided.
In terms of fulfilling the work demands
of the Assembly, much has already been achieved with
the present number of Members. To leave the number as
it is might prove in this second Assembly to create
a greater demand on members: if this turns out to be
the case, (and assuming that the administrative and
departmental civil service support is operating at full
efficiency) then the argument to enlarge the membership
would become more powerful. What is important, from
the point of view of the future of Wales and also from
the point of view of the attitude to, and perception
of, the Assembly among the people of Wales is that it
should be seen clearly to be working hard for the country,
and to be achieving real and measurable progress - to
be seen to be delivering results. If all that results
is a 'talking shop', particularly if it were one riven
by internal dissent, then public attitudes would rightly
become far more critical, even to the point that some
might say that the present number of members was too
high.
|
| The size of the Assembly with the acquisition
of further powers
There is a growing case for the acquisition
of further powers by the Assembly. It can be argued
that the present situation is a case of 'something and
nothing', and that the comparison with the Scottish
system reveals the National Assembly as somewhat inferior.
Certainly, increased powers would enhance the image
of the Assembly in the eyes of the Welsh people, and
would require an even greater degree of public accountability,
but this in turn could serve to help to improve the
image of the Assembly as a force for good in the country
and beyond.
A greater workload would enhance the
argument for increasing the number of Members. But at
the same time there might well be cause to reconsider
the number of Welsh Members of Parliament, as the argument
might be made that their workload had been reduced.
Perhaps some sort of balancing would be required to
satisfy the potential criticisms that might arise.
A further aspect would involve a reconsideration
of the role of County Councils, and in particular the
workload of County Councillors. In any event there is
a need, even with the present arrangements, to clarify
the relationship between AMs and the County Councillors
in their constituencies, and the responsibilities that
each have to their electorates; in some places this
need for greater liaison and joint working is being
pursued actively.
The Assembly's electoral system
I do not think that any change to the
present system should be contemplated until the Assembly
has worked through at least three administrations. The
current system has to be properly tested over a period
of 10 - 12 years.
|
| The Constituency Boundaries
I am against there being any alteration
in the number of Welsh parliamentary constituencies,
for the same reason as set out above.
In general, in terms of the above two
headings, many people have expressed the view to me
that there have already been too many changes in the
government of Wales over the past 10 years or more.
The changes in local government are seen by some as
being bad enough, but the creation of the Welsh Assembly
(and the matter of how many people actually voted for
it) is seen by such people as being almost the last
straw. They would oppose vehemently any further attempt
to change matters around yet again.
I do not take such a fixed view: I wish
to see the National Assembly for Wales being given time
to prove itself and to show true leadership for Wales
in this new century. Increased powers would increase
that opportunity and demonstrate fully that devolution
has been beneficial. There might be the need, and the
demand, far certain changes, but each would have to
be fully quantified and capable of rational justification.
The main criterion should be that the National Assembly
for Wales develops as a body that works hard and responsibly
to assist the evolution of Wales into a strong and confident
nation within the United Kingdom and the European ,
as well as a full participant in the World community.
Any changes that do not assist this process would be
highly questionable.
|
| Some general observations
There is an inherent problem in that
the Assembly is situated in Cardiff (rightly so, if
only from the point of view that Cardiff is the capital
of Wales) in the far south-east of the country. This
situation does give the impression, and to a great degree
the effect, that almost all the power and influence
is centred on the capital. Wales as a country suffers
from an inadequate infrastructure, the result of many
decades of less than adequate consideration and investment
by successive Westminster governments. To make the journey
from a village in mid-Wales to the nation's capital
involves one of two methods, either by road and rail,
or by road alone. Those living, for example, in Aberystwyth,
Newtown or Welshpool can, if they live close enough,
walk to the station and catch a train to Shrewsbury
(in England) then change for a train to Cardiff. Living
in a village entails a drive, assuming one has a car,
or a friend with a car, or (rare, this) access to a
bus route with a timetable that coordinates with the
railway timetable, to a station before and after such
a rail journey. In any event this can be a lengthy and
wearisome process. To drive from; say, Welshpool to
Cardiff involves a journey of at least three hours each
way on roads that, despite being designated as 'Trunk'
roads, are less than adequate, at least until one reaches
the Brecon area. Neither of these means of travel is
much of an inducement to those who wish to visit Cardiff
on business, or pleasure, or to partake of the cultural
riches of the capital. A visit to Cardiff for a performance
at the new Wales Millennium Centre would, realistically,
involve an overnight stay, at added and considerable
expense. The implications for those living in North
Wales are even more acute, and it is little wonder that
many in the north feel a closer cultural pull to Chester,
Liverpool or Manchester, access to all of which is considerably
easier.
The point of this is that Cardiff, and
by extension the National Assembly for Wales, is seen
by many in the middle and north of the country as being
less than completely relevant. One could say that many
people in these regions feel somewhat disenfranchised
because of their relative isolation from the capital,
and the government that is situated there.
Therefore the Assembly now faces great challenges that
will not be met by the introduction of token gestures.
For Wales, that is all of Wales, to thrive will require
a radical rethink of firstly the transport infrastructure
of the country, secondly of the manner in which cultural
and sports provision can be spread, and thirdly of the
need for decentralisation of administrative resources.
The economic well-being and development
of the parts of Wales between the Heads of the Valleys
road and the fast road along the north coast will not
be well served by their continuing isolation. New or
upgraded links (road and rail) are required, both from
north to south and, importantly for mid-Wales in particular,
from west to east, to link with the national motorway
and rail networks. In addition to this consideration
should be given to innovative ways of extending air
travel, perhaps with small feeder airports linking to
the existing main airports. These developments would
achieve a major change for the whole of Wales, but at
considerable cost.
There is a need to revise the manner
in which the cultural and sports infrastructure for
the nation is provided. At present it can be argued
clearly that the main cultural and sporting facilities
are in the south-east of the country. The National Assembly
should take a clear look at the needs of the whole country,
and ensure that full consideration is given to the provision
of international standard cultural and sporting facilities
beyond the south east in order to give equal opportunities
for all the nation's citizens. The present discussion
on a National Gallery of Contemporary Art is a case
in point: to situate such a major facility in, for example,
mid-Wales, would not only make it more accessible to
more people but would also act as a major regenerating
influence to the whole region. A similar argument can
be made for the provision of a national sports centre.
|
|
The third opportunity is to make positive
steps to moving some or even many of the Welsh Assembly
Government's departments out of Cardiff, situating them
in areas of economic need further afield. The currently
available resources of information and communication
technology such as video conferencing and broadband
internet links would make such a decentralisation both
effective and efficient. The economic benefit of moving
government departments and associated offices out of
the south-east would be of positive benefit to those
areas in which they were placed. This has been proved
already viable in Great Britain as a whole, with major
facilities being relocated far away from London.
Challenges such as those outlined above
need to be faced, and dealt with enthusiastically, if
the National Assembly for Wales is to become truly representative
and supportive of the whole country and not just the
privileged bottom right hand corner. The credibility
of the Assembly would be enhanced, much criticism would
be deflected and an increasing number of people would
come to trust in and support the essential work that
the Assembly needs to do if Wales is to thrive.
If this is done, and if work on making
these things possible is started sooner rather than
later, then the observation of Landsbergis, quoted at
the beginning of this response, will be justified, and
the National Assembly will truly be of Wales.
|
|
Richard Noyce
May 19th 2003.
(Richard Noyce writes on the visual arts,
and is the Liberal Democrat County Councillor for Newtown
Llanllwchaiarn North on Powys County Council.)
|
|
|
|
|
|