COMMISSION ON THE POWERS AND ELECTORAL
ARRANGEMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS
of the
EVIDENCE OF:
Wales Overseas Agencies Group
held at
Caradog House, Cardiff
On
FRIDAY 11 JULY 2003
|
| |
Participants
Lord Richard
Ted Rowlands
Dr Laura McAllister
Peter Price
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
Vivienne Sugar
Stephen Thomas
Jon Townley
|
| |
Proceedings
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Thank you very much for coming.
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
Thanks for the invitation.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Could I ask you to introduce yourselves
for the sake of the transcript and secondly if you'd
like to open up the topics that you want to raise with
us, then we will pursue the ones that we would like
to.
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
I am kicking off. I am Stephen Thomas
from the Welsh Centre for International Affairs at the
Temple of Peace here in Cardiff. Jon and myself are
here to represent six international agencies named on
the written submission of February, which I believe
you have?
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Yes.
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
In addition we will be covering briefly
this morning points to do with development education
and global citizenship which are very much part of the
Assembly's remit. In that respect we reflect a much
broader group of agencies involved in that work through
Cyfanfyd, the Development Education Association for
Wales, which has over 35 Members. We would like to go
through in sequence the five points that were in the
written paper. Clearly the Government of Wales Act and
specifically its clause 34 and the Memorandum of Understanding
that was drawn up in October '99 between the Assembly,
the UK Government and Scottish Ministers accept the
legitimacy of the involvement on international issues
of the devolved bodies such as the National Assembly.
The focus in the Memorandum of Understanding, the specific
concordat that formed part of the Memorandum, was with
the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO). That is quite
rightly so. However, four years of experience on the
part of our agencies really underlines that we feel
it is time for review of certain aspects of the Memorandum.
We note that it does make a commitment that it will
be reviewed on a regular basis and specifically we feel
that the Department for International Development should
additionally be included as a specific concordatee.
At present the relations between our agencies and the
Department for International Development (DFID) and
the Assembly are slightly ad hoc. There have been interesting
developments over the past four years. But I think clarity
and better co-operation could be brought about if there
were a more formalised format for those relationships.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can you spell out the actual practical
advantages of doing that?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
Yes. Much of the practical input that
has happened over the past four years with the Department
of International Development has been on development
awareness raising, development education, consultation
with groups such as ours in Wales. There are a certain
number of pigeon holes within the National Assembly
where different bits of that sit. The Education and
Training Division within the National Assembly has done
a lot to support that, especially with the sustainable
development remit that is very much to the fore there.
But there are other cases of joint events, the one we
quote from last spring in Cardiff, where it would not
have taken much co-ordination with the National Assembly
to have - if not combine the two things, at least ensure
that they were rather more symbiotic than they turned
out to be. Whereas the Education Department in the Assembly
is where much of the collaboration has been, we do feel
there are other strands: just to throw one in here,
the National Assembly has funded an international agency
already in the form of Dolen Cymru, the Wales Lesotho
link. This is a long established, 20 year old initially
twinning operation between Wales and Lesotho, but now
far more developmental in its work. It is interesting
that the Assembly has put financial commitment to that
organisation which has come I believe from the Youth
Section.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
I can see the argument which says that
you reduce the abrasions, if you like, by having two
meetings on in the same city on two successive weekends.
What are the positives of doing it? Are you talking
about that it would be a good thing for the Assembly
to organise their international affairs rather differently
and rather better taking account of more relevant matters?
What I don't understand, you see, is why you need a
formal concordat between the Assembly and the DFID and
what would go in the concordat.
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
I believe the formality of a concordat
would be useful because track records suggest that it
was not foreseen at the time this was drawn up that
there would be this quite detailed level of engagement
with the Department for International Development. We
believe that where there have been positive commitments
and moves on the National Assembly side there are still
various cubby holes where different people have a relationship
with the Department for International Development and
may not be fully aware of where others within the National
Assembly's Civil Service also do.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Do you know of an example of where something
has been written or connected or done as a result of
the FCO concordat?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
That's coming up under one of the next
points.
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
I'm the policy officer for Oxfam Cymru.
This point follows on from the last one. We believe
that the Assembly should have its own aid budget specifically
set aside for International Development. The Assembly
does quite a lot already: funding four Welsh teachers
in Patagonia; it funds Dolen Cymru to the tune of £85,000;
it has set aside a budget for £200,000 for an international
conference on sustainable development next March and
made a donation of £3,500 to a sustainable development
village in Johannesburg during the world summit on sustainable
development. A number of other devolved regions have
their own aid budgets. The Basque country, which the
Welsh Assembly Government is involved with through the
network of regional governments, has quite a large budget
but the Bailiwicks of Guernsey and Jersey also have
small budgets set aside. There have been moves in Scotland
the former Scottish Secretary was championing
the idea that Scotland should have its own budget and
links with our sister organisation in Scotland suggest
the Scottish Executive are pushing that forward. At
the moment as I say money is being spent but not being
done in a transparent way or an accountable way. We
would very much like to see it out in the open as a
commitment to that historic internationalism that Wales
has.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Could you answer the question then about
what in the course of this FCO concordat has happened
or been connected?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
Yes. It's most specifically in the European
Union theatre that that has been the case. There is
a couple of interesting compare and contrast examples
that show where it's worked in the way that we think
the concordat suggested it was going to, and that is
the submission to the European Convention of a UK line
on regional policy and regional governance by Peter
Hain. But the paper that was being presented was essentially
a joint effort by the Scottish Executive and the Welsh
Assembly Government, being put forward in the name of
the UK.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
That's a good thing. Not a bad thing.
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
That's the positive example we are quoting
where the distinctiveness from Wales is properly reflected.
But there is also an example where there seems to have
been advance and yet it's not quite as positive.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
That was done under the terms of the
FCO Assembly concordat?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
Yes. If we take agriculture on the European
level as an example, there seems to be fairness in that
Scotland, Welsh Assembly Government, England and the
UK Government consult, and take it in turns to present
cases. But when it is the Welsh Assembly Government's
minister that does that he or she is presenting the
UK line and the Welsh distinctiveness is therefore much
more sotto voce.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
That's inevitable. The EU is an association
of member states, you can't have member States speaking
in four different voices.
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
No, not four different voices but where
the emphasis perhaps reflects a more specific set of
Welsh issues.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
That I understand. But surely the way
to sort that out is before you get to establishing the
UK position that the Welsh Minister from time to time
will actually articulate. I have to tell you in all
the evidence that we have had one thing that has been
fairly immune from criticism are the European arrangements
with the National Assembly. As far as I can see the
Assembly are reasonably content with the way in which
it works and feel that the Welsh voice is properly heard.
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
Were not denying that. That's why
we're returning to point number one; if it has been
a useful basis for effective collaboration on European
and broader FCO things, let's put something in place
for DFID which may be a useful spring board for greater
understanding between the two agencies.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can I come back to Mr Townley's ideas
for a separate aid budget for Wales. I can see the argument
which says that will make it more transparent. I thought
it was pretty transparent already, but perhaps not in
a coordinated way. Do you see Wales through the Assembly
having a Minister for International Development, then
perhaps an aid budget from the Assembly administering
aid programmes rather like a mini DFID?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
Not in the medium term future for sure.
I'm not sure that would be something that Oxfam would
want to see; a duplication in that way. Wales has a
history of internationalism which we seek to capitalise
on. A Minister with responsibility for International
Affairs would be good. We did have the former deputy
First Minister he was Minister for Wales Abroad for
instance. That portfolio seems to have been lost. It's
an interesting aside perhaps that this network of regional
governments for sustainable development conference taking
place in Cardiff next year, the Assembly has set aside
a large chunk of money, yet there is no Assembly Committee
that is scrutinising that. It does not appear to be
accountable. We are very much in favour of them hosting
the conference. We think its a good thing that
it is happening. But it's not being considered by any
of the Assembly's Committees, or the all partly group
on International Development.
|
|
Dr Laura McAllister
|
|
Have you tried to determine where those
kind of areas will fall now in the new allocation of
portfolios? Have you sought information from the Assembly?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
Carwyn Jones is responsible for sustainable
development, but it seems that Rhodri Morgan has taken
the Wales Abroad portfolio. So he -- it's his Civil
Servants that are dealing with the conference. So it's
not being---
|
|
Dr Laura McAllister
|
|
Theres no Subject Committee parallel?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
No that's right.
|
|
Peter Price
|
|
Can I clarify what would be the purpose
of the budget and what would be the kind of intention
of having such a budget? What would be distinctively
Welsh? Because you talked about not duplicating, not
trying to duplicate what the DFID is up to. What is
distinctive that it needs to be done by the Assembly?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
The Assembly has a unique duty to promote
sustainable development, for instance. We have done
quite a lot of work on the issue of sustainable development
with the world summit on sustainable last year and the
Assembly's involvement. There is for instance, this
network of regional governance, where Oxfam is very
keen to see governments of devolved regions from developing
countries being involved. Its very difficult for
them to find the finance to do that. The Assembly Government
to its credit funded someone from Ghana to come to the
last network meeting which took place in San Sebastian.
That's the sort of thing we would like to see the Assembly
being able to do. As it is it was just done quietly
without going through certain channels you know that
if it had been debated in the Assembly probably somebody
would have said it was ultra viries.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
It probably was, wasn't it?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
Probably was. Well, it shouldn't have
been.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Maybe, but then you go to the Act and
see what is devolved and is not devolved.
|
|
John Townley
|
|
This is somewhere we would like to see
the Assembly having more---
|
|
Sir Michael
Wheeler-Booth
|
|
Under Section 121 of the Government of
Wales Act they have a specific duty to have a scheme
and to report annually. They said it cannot delegate
this duty. Is that happening?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
A scheme on sustainable development,
yes.
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
Sustainable development means different
things to different people. As far as we're concerned
we would say that Wales can't be sustainable in isolation
and therefore needs to be playing a part on the world
stage and this network is a great example of how that
would be done. We would like to see more of it happening,
but there is an argument as to how much the Assembly
can do in this field.
|
|
Sir Michael
Wheeler-Booth
|
|
They are actually under a duty to do
it. Because it's laid down in an Act of Parliament.
As far as I am aware no other body in the UK has this
similar duty and if it isn't happening they are in dereliction
of their statutory obligations in a sense.
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
The Act is within Wales.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
What is the power you think the Assembly
should have? What is the nature of the power you are
suggesting? They can spend money, they have been sending
money, although you say whether it's ultra vires. Power
to promote sustainable development, they can be put
into that pigeon hole, if you like. You are suggesting
they have a separate duty or power?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
To be honest I am not sure that that's
what we are suggesting. I would like to see this area
expanded and the budget itself would bring clarity.
At the moment we are saying that the fact that the Assembly
has a duty to promote sustainable development means
it can do these things. That's not a widely held opinion.
Most of the work has been about domestic matters. There
is an argument to be had.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
In terms of aid policy, I don't quite
understand how you can have a different approach say
from England and Wales to the UK. What would be the
difference?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
Not too much of a difference, the DFID
has an enormous budget and is involved in very many
countries. But there are specific links that Wales has,
Dolen Cymru, a good example, Lesotho, where it would
be proper in our view for Wales to be involved in a
way that say the UK is not interested in being involved.
Patagonia is another example where we have links.
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
You have to have one or the other. Either
you have to have devolved powers to deal with the Welsh
interest abroad or you need to have a UK department
in the non-devolved sphere being more sensitive to different
parts of the UK. You could argue that the funding given
to Dolen Cymru should have come from the DFID budgets
to make the case to them, a percentage of their funding
should go for particular Welsh interests. So we are
caught in between the two in a sense.
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
That's fair.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Will you go on to asylum?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
Yes. The dispersal of asylum seekers
into Wales has been handled extremely badly in our opinion
and in the opinion of most of the agencies involved
with asylum seekers. We currently have 2088 asylum seekers
in Wales. Most of them arrived on coaches sent by the
National Asylum Seekers Service, NASS, part of the Home
Office. The agencies involved in housing asylum seekers
are told that the coach will be arriving with 28 asylum
seekers on it. That's all that they know. The coach
will arrive. Maybe the people are Somalis, Iraqis, maybe
half are children who require additional services. Then
the agencies do their best to house them. Often they
have to return to London to have their cases heard.
If and when their cases are heard, say their request
for asylum is successful they then have 14 days to get
out of the accommodation they have been provided and
to register for benefits and find themselves somewhere
to live. There is a case this week of a woman whose
appeal has been granted, she's nine months pregnant,
living in a hostel at the moment. She's been told he
has 14 days, she's about to give birth, she's been told
she has to leave. There is a further issue of 45 asylum
seekers in Wales---
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Leave temporary accommodation?
|
|
Participant
|
|
And benefits. So she's---
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
She won her case?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
So she's off.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Once she's won she's no longer an asylum
seeker.
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
Somebody else's problem. In fairness
to the Assembly they have set up a Welsh Refugee Integration
Forum to hopefully ease that transition.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
You would be hard pressed to find anybody
who didn't think that if the Assembly had been able
to orchestrate the process they would have come up with
something more efficient and humane than the way its
being done now. But it is deliberate UK Government policy.
It's part of the general approach to asylum seekers.
It would be difficult to imagine entry into the UK being
handled completely separately in Wales compared with
England, compared with Scotland. What are the arrangements
in Scotland and are they subject to the same problems
that you are describing for asylum seekers in Wales?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
I'm afraid I'm not an expert by any means
on the situation in Scotland. My understanding is the
situation is worse in Scotland. There is a consensus
in the Assembly, that asylum seekers should be treated
better, in the way that there is not in England or in
the UK. We would not want Wales to have separate arrangements
for people seeking asylum. But I believe that the Home
Office could say well, here we are, your allocation
is 2088 people and the Assembly could then take it from
there.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
They have already been asked to do that
and refused to do that and I don't know whether its
formally been expressed but the argument is that the
administration of asylum is part of the general policy
of deterrence. So it's not a question of whether the
Assembly, if it had powers could do things differently,
its a question of whether its possible the
power would be transferred because it would mean that
a different system would exist in a different parts
of the UK. I really can't see the UK government agreeing
to that somehow.
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
You may well be right. The situation
is we believe that Wales would do a better job and therefore
should. We would be more humane. It is just not right
and the four main parties in Wales accept that. The
Minister for Social Justice is today meeting with the
relevant UK Ministers to press the case for a particular
group of failed asylum seekers who are left without
any funding at all, who can't be returned to their country
of origin and who are completely destitute. Maybe that
is part of the UK Government policy but if that is the
case Wales should do something.
|
|
Peter Price
|
|
Is there any kind of half way house achievable
whereby some kind of agency arrangement would confer
on the Assembly the responsibility to carry out a wide
measure of the organisation of how this is handled in
Wales, but within an overall policy framework set for
the UK and within budget constraint which is comparable
to what is elsewhere? Is that a feasible answer or does
it depend, inter alia, on more expenditure in order
to do the job properly?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
I'm sure that the arrangement could be
better. The existing arrangements could be made to work
better. NASS is particularly poor at the dispersal of
asylum seekers. If there were better liaison the situation
would be more humane. You would end up with Somali asylum
seekers going to areas where there are other Somalis,
rather than ending up in Wrexham.
|
|
Peter Price
|
|
So its not actually at the level
of within Wales how you handle it, the problem starts
with NASS and the way that people simply arrive here
without consideration of where in the UK they are being
sent?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
Yes, that's right. There is not a Wales
level of engagement.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
What evidence -- we received evidence
on the Assembly's input into the International Immigration
Asylum Act. Were you involved in any way through the
Assembly on making representations about the nature
of the Asylum Act?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
Not at the Wales level, no.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Two issues were raised; the issue of
the data gateways and also the question of accommodation
centres. You were not involved in those issues at all?
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
No.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Anything else on asylum? Europe.
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
I think we've said what we have to say
about Europe in response to Mr Rowlands' point, unless
there is anything further?
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Do you feel Wales gets a fair crack of
the whip as far as Europe is concerned?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
I think it reflects fairly what is agreed
in the Concordat and that is good.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Not doing badly on the regional side
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
On the financial front. True, yes.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Have you a draft of what type of Memorandum
you would like to see being established within the Assembly?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
No. We would be interested in being sub-contracted
to do something of that nature.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Electoral reform.
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
Simply one point again arising from our
agencies' experience over the first four years of the
Assembly. Even with the current powers that it has we
feel that the level of real scrutiny that is needed
is not necessarily fully done that Assembly Members
have been stretched between Subject Committees, Regional
Committees, all party groups and other such commitments.
Certainly if there were additional powers to be conferred
on the Assembly we feel even more so that more Members
would be needed.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can you tell us a bit about your experience
with the Assembly in the last few years? What sorts
of things have you been trying to do and how successful
and what sort of reception you get?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
Right. Our experience in terms of individual
contact and advocacy or lobbying work with particular
Assembly Members has been very positive. The whole issue
of ease of access has been shown to be there. Where
we have been less successful is in trying to put forward
in a coherent way to a group of Assembly Members what
some of our campaigns are, what some of the issues that
we deal with are that have a direct overlap with the
Assembly's remit. We have set---
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Such as?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
We have set up an all party International
Development Group which has had some interesting meetings
and has had some follow up action. One specific example
there is on fair trade and the Welsh Assembly Government's
procurement policy to do with its coffee and tea, following
some sort of fair trade principles. So that is a specific
thing that is within the wheels.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can I ask you about the mechanisms. Do
you go and see Rhodri and put this to him? Or what level
do you input into the Assembly machine?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
No, on that one we didn't do it at that
level. We convene an all party group and a smattering
of Assembly Members from the various parties come. The
fair trade issue happened to be again when Mike German
had that Wales Abroad portfolio and expressed a wish
there be something concrete to be followed up. Rhodri
Morgan has taken part in one of the other all party
groups reporting pack to other AMs on the Johannesburg
summit and the follow up.
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
We produced a manifesto for the Assembly
election. We had a launch in the Assembly. We held hustings
meetings in constituencies and launched it at each of
the four party conferences. So we try every means possible
to get to Assembly Members. In the last week we held
an all party group meeting, I organised a lunch time
launch of a document on gender and participation. The
problem for both times was that there were at least
three, if not four other events going on at the same
time, group meetings, Chairs of Committee meetings.
In our view there are not enough Assembly Members to
go round to engage with us properly.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
How many do you want? Apart from more.
|
|
Jon Townley
|
|
Well, the Wales Overseas Agencies Group
has said 20 additional. That would be more.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Is this on election? Or are you just
given the nod?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
We have suggested that the list system
might be the most appropriate to extend to a further
20.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
So the existing list system but larger?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
Yes.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
You don't share the disquiet that has
been expressed particularly since the last election
on the list system arrangement?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
I don't think that we feel that its
perfect by any means, but if there were to be reconsideration
of the form of proportionality used then that may be
positive. But we feel if there were to be an extension
in numbers of representatives it should be through some
form of proportionality rather than changing the first
past the post electorate.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Good. Thank you very much indeed. Unless
there are other any points you want to put?
|
|
Stephen Thomas
|
|
No, thanks for finding us the time.
|
|
|