|
COMMISSION ON THE POWERS AND ELECTORAL
ARRANGEMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES
|
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS
of the
EVIDENCE OF:
Gwenda Thomas AM
Chair of National Assembly for Wales
Equality of Opportunity Committee
held at
Caradog House, Cardiff
On
FRIDAY 25 JULY 2003
|
|
In Attendance
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Eira Davies (part thereof)
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
Peter Price
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
Huw Thomas
|
|
Paul Valerio
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth KCB
|
|
Gwenda Thomas AM
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
Proceedings
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Thank you very much for coming. Could
you identify yourselves for the transcript and then
open up the discussion for us?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes, thank you. I am Gwenda Thomas and
I Chair the National Assembly's Equality of Opportunity
Committee.
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
I am Claire Bennett - Committee Clerk.
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Just a short introduction. I am grateful
for this opportunity to give the evidence on the work
of the Equality of Opportunity Committee. The Committee
felt it was important that the Commission had the chance
to hear first hand about issues that the Committee deals
with and the way it conducts its business.
|
|
I plan to briefly summarise the role
of the Committee and issues it considered, how it conducts
its business and how it has evolved over time.
|
|
The role of the Committee, is to audit
the arrangements the Assembly puts in place, to promote
equality of opportunity for all people in the exercise
of its functions and the conduct of its business. The
Committee has considered a wide range of issues and
produced a range of outputs. For example, it has conducted
a detailed policy review of 'Service Provision for Gypsies
and Travellers'.
|
|
The review was very cross-cutting, and
it covered the issues falling within a number of ministerial
portfolios. The Committee has responded to a number
of consultation documents, for example, on the UK Government's
proposal for a single equality body and on the access
to electoral procedures.
|
|
A sub-group of the Committee acted as
the steering group for the joint Assembly Equal Opportunities
Commission and the TUC equal pay campaign.
|
|
The Committee gave detailed consideration
to how the education recommendations contained in the
Stephen Lawrence inquiry report could be implemented
by the Welsh Assembly.
|
|
The Committee examined the treatment
of asylum seekers in Wales and, with the Minister, was
successful in ensuring that asylum seekers were no longer
housed inside Cardiff prison.
|
|
The Committee has conducted its business
on the basis of consensus.
|
|
The Committee has evolved over time.
In particular, there has been a significant shift in
the role of the Minister: for much of the first Assembly,
a minister was required by Standing Orders, to chair
the Committee. In November last year Standing Orders
were revised so that Ministers could no longer chair
the Committee and, until the election, the Minister
with cross-cutting responsibilities for equality remained
as a Member of Committee.
|
|
Now, the Committee has no ministers as
members, but can call ministers for scrutiny.
|
|
I hope that is helpful.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Yes, can I pursue the last bit - no ministers
as members of the Committee?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes. There are no ministers as members
of the Committee. We have the new portfolio for social
justice, and that Minister has overall responsibility
for equal opportunities, but the Committee does have
the power to call in any minister, for example, the
First Minister to give evidence to us.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Are you the only Committee?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Sorry?
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Are you the only Committee in the Assembly
where the Minister does not sit?
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
The Audit Committee does not have a minister
for obvious reasons, neither does the Legislation Committee.
It is the only Committee with a policy scrutiny role
that does not have a minister.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
This is since last September?
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
Since May.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Since the election?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes. It is a decision that the Minister
has taken and that decision has been explained to the
Committee.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Do you see yourselves as a sub-committee
of the Welsh Assembly?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
I would not want that. I would want the
Committee to be as effective as it possibly can be as
a Standing Committee as opposed to a Subject Committee,
of course, and the Assembly has no (inaudible).
|
|
The Standing Orders do require us to
have an Equality of Opportunity Committee. In order
to be effective, I do think it has got to have powers
across the board.
|
|
Peter Price
|
|
To clarify, if I may, the other two committees:
Audit and Legislation have never had a Minister as a
member, but the only change in May was in respect of
your Committee.
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
There was a change in the European Committee
as well, yes, at the same time.
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
Yes, shall I speak to this?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes, please.
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
Up until November last year, the European
Committee and the Equality of Opportunity Committee
were required to be chaired by a Minister but after
a change to Standing Orders ministers were no longer
able to chair the Committees.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Who was the Minister?
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
Do you mean European Minister, or the
Equality Minister? It was Carwyn Jones at the time.
He was Minister for open government and that portfolio
included equality.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
He was on the Committee?
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
Yes and then in May, the Minister with
cross-cuting responsibility for equality was Edwina
Hart and she decided she did not wish to be a member
of the Committee but wanted to come and give evidence.
|
|
The European Minister continued as Member
of that Committee. Therefore, there are two Committees
in the same position in terms of the Standing Orders
which have taken a different route.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Do you find it more helpful to be slightly
detached?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
I believe we are finding our way. I have
just started to chair the Committee, and I certainly
had some reservations when this was first put and wanted
to make sure that Standing Orders did support the Minister's
decision not to be a Member of the Committee. Having
had the opportunity to read the guidance from the Legal
Department, I accept that Standing Orders do now allow
the Minister not to be a Member of the Standing Committee
but, nevertheless, she has overall responsibility for
Equality of Opportunity.
|
|
So, we need to see how the role develops
and how we connect with the portfolio, and where the
responsibility lies. I think it is very much an exploratory
process at the moment.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can you call ministers from other departments?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes, indeed, including the First Minister.
I would think that with certain issues, particularly
on social justice, we might have to have even three
ministers to attend the Committee at the same time or
to link the evidence from one minister to another.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Very interesting. You are a more detached
Committee than the other committees.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
One of the interesting points that comes
out of your paper is that the Committee has twice decided
not to venture into the jungle of human rights. What
are the reasons for this decision?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes, I know that in the forward programme
we are going to look at the Human Rights Act again but
perhaps Claire can recall.
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
Yes, the basic reason was that the Committee
felt that the Government of Wales Act produces the specific
duty to promote equality of opportunity, and it was
important that the Committee adopt that focus. Should
they choose to look at human rights as well, it would
become unfocused and risk looking at specific cases
of infringements of rights legislation.
|
|
I think the Committee recognised it might
be appropriate that someone looked at human rights but
did not think it should dilute its own focus on equality.
|
|
The Committee has looked at this issue
twice and has come to the same conclusion; it was not
the right thing for the Equality of Opportunity Committee
to be doing. The Committee touches on human rights issues
quite often. For example, the review of service provision
for Gypsies and Travellers draws on the provisions of
the Human Rights Act and Convention.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Which committee is responsible to look
at that?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
There's not one.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
Your major piece of work is on Gypsies
and Travellers. I was trying to think of what your Report
was brewing up. I have realised it has actually been
produced now but I am afraid I have not had the chance
to read. It is a great big report.
|
|
To go into this subject, yet always leaving
everything out within the human rights field would seem,
to me, very difficult.
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
The experience I have of this was from
a group where an issue arose when, indeed, we had to
have advice on the human rights aspect. I think that
there will be a time when we have to consult the Legal
Department on whether the Human Rights Act does effect
decisions that we have made, or are about to make. I
cannot see that we can say that we will never touch
on the Human Rights Act. That is my view.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
Has the Committee considered the issue
of Freemasons?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
No, the Standards Committee has, but
not the Equality of Opportunity Committee. I can say
about the Standards Committee because I am a member
of that. Indeed, that Committee was the one in which
the question of the Human Rights Act I mentioned earlier
arose.
|
|
Huw Thomas
|
|
In discussing more generally the scope
of the Committee, one of the things that came up in
the evidence session we had before was the question
about whether the Assembly, by its way of promoting
Equal Opportunities, was actually exceeding some of
the statutory powers to do so. It is the North Wales
Ethnic Minority Committee that raised this, so I am
just intrigued to bottom it out. Is there any kind of
problem that you are aware of?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
It all depends on what we mean by promoting
Equal Opportunities. Certainly I have mentioned that
Equal Opportunities is dealt with quite clearly in the
Government of Wales Act, and there is an absolute responsibility
placed on the National Assembly for Wales to ensure
equality of opportunity.
|
|
I think what we need to understand is
what exactly the Government of Wales Act means when
it refers to this. There is a requirement along with
ensuring Equal Opportunities to ensure sustainable development,
for example, and social inclusion which is mentioned
in the Government of Wales Act. Therefore, I would like
to be able to decide exactly what the Government of
Wales Act is saying to the Assembly. Is it telling us
to promote Equal Opportunities? Is it telling us to
ensure that there is no discrimination in the Assembly's
policy development work? Or what, exactly, is being
said here?
|
|
I think there is room for clarification.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
If you find that there is discrimination,
what can you actually do?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
It depends on whether the rules are covered
because some have to be referred to outside bodies and
even to the Standards Committee, and it is not outside
the powers of the Equality of Opportunity Committee
to refer to the Standards Committee or, indeed, to the
full Assembly. I think it very much depends on the nature
of the discrimination.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Yes.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
I wanted to ask that as the Committee
is developed, and it is starting to produce reports,
whether the reports' conclusions actually call on the
UK Government to do anything?
|
|
There were a lot of gypsies in 1967,
or something like that. Anyway, a lot of it is primarily
legislation that has not been devolved to the Assembly.
|
|
Similarly, with the work you did on asylum
seekers, we heard evidence in this room a fortnight
ago that it was difficult for the Assembly to act in
any more of a "Humanitarian way" because the responsibility
was with the Home Office, and so forth.
|
|
I wondered in this particular field if
you were coming up against these issues of powers all
the time, and the type of policy recommendations to
which you are coming up against?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes, I think that would have been particularly
relevant when we looked at the social justice aspect.
In my view, this always comes up against the benefits
issue. I think we saw that with the introduction of
the Assembly's Learning Grants.There was a stumbling
of the way, if you like, before that policy could be
introduced.
|
|
So, yes I do believe as we are talking
about equality of opportunity and looking at issues,
we have now a situation where, for example, CAFCAS is
an England and Wales organisation. We now understand
that the responsibility for CAFCAS is going to transfer
to the UK Minister who has responsibility for children.
In the UK Government at the moment, it is Margaret Hodge,
she is going to have responsibility for CAFCAS. That
brings in the Guardian Ad Litum issue, et cetera.
|
|
That is very much an issue for Equality
of Opportunity so we need to clarify now how that is
going to connect with the Assembly Minister for Health
and Social Services.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
How would you clarify it? Is it that
you produce a report that is given to the Minister in
the Assembly, and then the Minister in the Assembly
then talks to Margaret Hodge?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes, but we need to follow that through
and understand the link because it will touch across
portfolios here. We need to be quite clear how we will
connect because although Wales has very definite separate
policies on children's issues and needs to influence
primary legislation and governance.This is how those
policies can be developed.
|
|
When we are talking about different portfolios,
responsibility for CAFCAS lies with the DEFS, for example,
in Westminster, and in the Assemblyewith Health and
Social Services . It is then that I really do think
that these matters need to be referred on as they arise.
This particular one on CAFCAS has arisen and it is going
to have be an issue and have an effect on how we develop
children's policies in the Welsh Assembly.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Yes, fine.
|
|
(The following in Welsh, then interpreted)
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
With regard to that particular problem,
how would you go about tackling that problem? Would
you ask the Minister in the Assembly? Would you ask
the Minister in the Assembly to invite Margaret Hodge
to devolve CAFCAS, or some sort of system of co-operation
between two ministers which would then provide you with
the necessary information?
|
|
The final point. Would you expect to
be able to call officials from England/Wales Bodies
to appear before you and give evidence?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes. I think we are talking here about
whether we should have more powers. I suppose we should
be able to call on people from outside the public sector
to appear before the Committee if the need should arise.
However, I think that it would make a great deal of
sense if CAFCAS were to be directly responsible to Wales
and the Assembly, and then there may be less confusion
on the occasions when these kind of things arise.
|
|
Another example is the Youth Justice
Board. This serves England and Wales. Questions will
arise on the work of the Youth Justice Board as to how
we look at strategies to avoid crime, for example, but
these institutions do have a responsibility on an England
and Wales basis. We have to look to see if there is
a way to get rid of the confusion by bringing them directly
responsible to Wales, and to separate that from the
responsibility to England.
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
One other brief question, just looking
at the Committee's work, what is the situation in terms
of the research? Do you have a research officer for
your Committee?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes, we could appoint someone to assist
us from outside the Assembly, and to give advice to
Committee or we can use the officials already working
within the Assembly that are there to give advice. There
is a unit that has been established to give advice either
to committees or to individual members and they have
just started on their work; the unit is developing.
|
|
I think it is going to be extremely valuable
to the Assembly as a whole and to the various committees
within the Welsh Assembly.
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
What was the main reason the Minister
gave for not being a main Member of the Committee?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
I think she saw it as something that
should be the responsibility of each and every Minister
and, although she did have responsibility for equality
of opportunity within her portfolio, I think she felt
- and there is a letter that the Commission could be
given to explain this - the Minister felt there was
a responsibility on every minister rather than the individual
Minister, and the First Minister agreed.
|
|
(End of Welsh translation)
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
On the report on the Gypsies and Travellers,
did the Committee identify where the Assembly did not
have to implement its recommendations?
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
Yes. The majority of the Report focuses
on things in the Assembly's remit. There is a chapter
on education issues, a chapter on health issues and
then there are things to do with the sort of statutory
framework for sites provision; that is a matter of primary
legislation.
|
|
There is a table at the back of the Report
that has all the recommendations that states to whom
they are aimed and what the Committee expects to happen.
|
|
In the case of those recommendations
that are a matter for the UK Government, the recommendation
is for the Assembly Government to talk to their counterparts
in Westminster to bring about the specific changes outlined.
|
|
On sites provision, the recommendation
is about finding out what is the best way of implementing
the situation rather than saying "we must do this".
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
In those areas identified to UK Ministers,
was it a suggestion of the Committee that they should
have a functional power or should be part of an influence
upon a UK administration that was accepted had to remain
at UK level?
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
I do not think really it addresses that
question. They are phrased more like 'this is a problem
that needs to be solved and in the current legislatitive
situation, you need to talk to the UK Government about
it and then decide if the relevant powers should be
transferred, and if so how'.
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
Does it not identify a set of standards?
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
It is not phrased in that work.
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
Yes, it is unfinished work or business
until the loop has been...
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
The Committee could recommend that the
Minister has responsibility in the Assembly as the direct
contact. That has happened with housing stock transfer
where the first recommendation of the Committee was
quite clear that money should be made available for
public retention of ownership in Wales. The Minister
was then charged to take that to the...
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
Yes, battle with the Treasury.
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
I do not see the Equality of Opportunity
Committee would be restricted to do that.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
You mentioned in this work you were up
against benefits and individual rights issues. How far
do you want these things to become devolved in as much
as are you willing to accept the concept of variable
rights and benefits in these fields? That is a very,
very difficult field to walk into.
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes, it is a very complicated issue.
However, I quite firmly believe that the benefits issue
is going to be an ongoing problem.
|
|
In order to develop any social justice
policy it is vital. If you look at the means testing
procedure and the requirement at the moment., You can
have a person's pay packet means-tested at least four
times before you decide how much council tax should
be paid. I think there is room for simplifying the means-testing
procedure that might allow the responsibility to be
devolved, although within the same regulation requirements,
I think that could happen.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
You distinguish the Administration to
have a variable to certain benefits, housing benefits?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes. At the moment we have devolved the
power to local authorities to means-test in order to
assess student loans, in order to assess student grants
and in order to assess housing benefits. Why can't the
Assembly do that as well? If the Assembly gives the
responsibility for administration to local authorities,
as has happened in many of these issues, then perhaps
there could be in-built possibilities for the Assembly
to be able to consider the benefits issues that effect
that policy while it is developing the policy. Then
we would not need this panic contact with Westminster
when these things arise at the last minute.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Yes.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
I notice you have on your work plan a
list of other issues to be considered.
|
|
On discrimination and on the issue of
language, given there is responsibility for the Welsh
Language Act which is not devolved, where and when discussion
takes place it tends to be the Culture Committee. Can
you expand on what that work might involve?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
It is not only the Welsh language, of
course, there should be responsibility for the other
languages of Wales. My view is that we need to extend
the principle of bi-lingualism to embrace all languages.
If you think of translating everything into every language,
one can see that there is a considerable cost. In translating
everything into Welsh, for example, or producing all
the papers timeously, that is a problem at the moment.
|
|
However, I do think that if an individual
or an organisation has any difficulty in communicating
in any other language other than their home language,
we should accommodate them and have no discrimination
just because they cannot speak English, or Welsh, for
that matter.
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
Some of the work that the Committee has
done previously on Welsh language is around public appointments,
and ensuring that the Welsh language is represented
on the Board Committees. That is one thing that has
been looked at previously.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
Would it extend into the planning of
service provision? What is the distinction between what
the Culture Committee does and what you do in terms
of, particularly, Welsh language?
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
I think there would be a lot of similarities
in the issue that is considered. I think the difference
is that the Culture Commission is seeking to make it
possible to embrace all other languages because it is
very much a part of that portfolio, and it would be
a requirement in policy development within that portfolio.
|
|
For Equal Opportunities, I think it would
be to look more particularly on any discriminatory practices
that could arise within that.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
In paragraphs 21 and 22 of your Report,
you talk about equality and diversity, and making it
happen.
|
|
In paragraph 22 you refer to, "The Committee
stress that a new Body would need a single legislative
underpinning that and a single equality Act with a pre-requisite
for it to be able to operate effectively".
|
|
Just now you were talking in a way that
was very helpful on difficult issues such as benefits.
If we had a single Act, it is a bit difficult to see
how a single Act could satisfactorily encompass the
Welsh and English practice.
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
I think what has been considered here,
and perhaps Claire will help, is the establishment of
an equality board.
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
Yes.
|
|
Gwenda Thomas
|
|
Yes the Single Equality Board. That would
be an issue. I have not been involved with this issue,
but I mentioned the Youth Justice Board, an England/Wales
organisation. I think the matter could arise here as
well.
|
|
Claire Bennett
|
|
The issue is all about a number of European
Directives which are coming into force soon and which
provide equality legislation for further equality strands,
for example sexual orientation, age etc. The quote is
drawn from the Committee's conclusions on how these
Directives should be implemented.
|
|
At the moment, you have the Race Relations
and Disability Rights legislation and Gender legislation,
all of which are phrased slightly differently and have
different powers and different enforcement powers. If
you are bringing in another set of equality strands,
and yet more different sorts of levels of status, it
is very complicated and complicated for business to
know what they are supposed to be applying to different
people. It was concluded that a single Act would help
qualify things because you would have clarity of the
status of the different equality strands.
|
|
The Committee also concluded this would
be done on a UK basis, but that they would want to see
a Welsh arm of a single equality body with a high level
of independence in Wales.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Yes, good. Thank you very much indeed.
We have been very grateful to you for coming back.
|
|
|